Will Jim Fenner get shafted tonight?

Well, DID he get shafted?

I am not fish, so please leave her alone. Are you REALLY upset by my mild bit of nonsense at the start of this thread? It was hardly offensive. I did tell a little porky though - I really do want to know if Jim got shafted. Well? Julian, I've taken your advice and it has worked wonders. Why didn't I think of it before? Thank you.

Obviously not.

Does anyone apart from Karl give a toss? Better question: How many more threads will Karl start if Jim Fenner does/does not get shafted? Place your bets...

Who IS Jim Fenner, anyway?

Who is 134.32.201 that's what I'm wondering? He/she has a lot of pent up cynicism that seems to come spilling onto the forums whenever he/she touches a keyboard. I diagnose a healthy dose of alcohol to ease the stress. By the way, this does not mean I think Bad Girls is a good programme (I checked who Jim Fenner was - a character in the series by all accounts), as I don't. It's ghastly, but each to their own.

It is a @!#$ programme. I agree. But my brain tends to go into neutral when I reach home and I'm having my dinner. Well (or a.k.a. 134.32.201) is just another of those tossers who think they have something to say, but don't dare say it to your face. They hide behind their pseudonyms. The best thing to do with them is to ignore them. I very rarely answer someone's comments unless they have the courage to put their own name behind them. Otherwise, they don't amount to anything, do they? They're just crude graffitti writers. I've an idea who Well is, and it would be fun to draw them out into the open, but I just can't be bothered.

Karl, you once told me off for saying you were 'monopolising the threads' (I borrowed it from someone else).BUT:- One: I don't think anyone can do that - you don't have to read them all. and Two: Why shouldn't you? (there's no 'unwritten rule' is there?) But, please , for the record, on recent experience, I have to say :- I rest my case :-) Best wishes.

Fair point.