Fleece 2

http://www.koopress.co.uk/speaking.htm Styx, "But it does seem to be the men on here that find her in some way threatening" erm, don't know where you get that from, I'd have thought there are more women having a go at galarcherjek than men. Although, come to think of it, I reckon it's fairly even now a few others have joined in. In fact, if you look at the reverse situation ie Who is defending AG you will note that you, mykle, pepsoid and I think there was someone else the other week but I can't remember who, are all men. Not one woman has leapt to her defence. Even nice Jude has stayed neutral. Interesting huh? As for feeling threatened, I don't think that's what's behind this at all. I can't speak for anyone else but I usually find intelligent women _very_ attractive - particularly if they have a razor wit. I was about to list the women on this site (both past and present members) who fall into that category and with whom I have had contact (at meetings and via e-mail) but fear of leaving someone out and thus upsetting them has stopped me. All I can say is this: most of the women here are as bright if not brighter than AG. Those I have met are all attractive and those I have not seem so. If I wasn't married to an incredibly attactive and sexy, intelligent woman, I'd be making all sorts of indecent proposals for nights of debauchery to these particular ladies (whether they would accept is, of course, an entirely different matter). So, why don't I feel that way about galarcherjek? Dunno, must be something to do with her online persona I guess. Anyway; threatening? you're 'aving a larf, son.

Jack-twink-toad It's not fishing if your a fish. Hovering near the surface and blowing fart bubbles like a big ole' carp will attract attention. I happened to stroll by when you did this. My point was and continues to be (with the exception of pizza night a few weeks ago), you bring me up in passing conversation, normally as an object of your disdain (which is okay if you're willing to accept the result). You seem preoccupied with your perception of what you think I am (which is okay, if you're willing to accept the result), and feel it necessary to attack me without provocation (which is okay, if you're willing to accept the result) Your main failure in all this is you aren't willing to accept the result and would rather rationalize my reasons for interacting with you and marginalize your own reasons for your constant pre-occupation with my existence on these threads, when in truth, I don't give a flying fuck about you and think of you as nothing more than a small furry dog that nips at someones heals each time they get near it. You used to do this with Mississippi, but now it is me. I'm quite positive that he's more than happy to not have to deal with you. I don't have a problem with it, I can turn the computer off anytime and you'll cease to exist. All that lovely shit aside, I'm still wondering if those pimples cleared up? Visit me http://www.radiodenver.org/

http://www.koopress.co.uk/speaking.htm I love the way this thread is developing into sub-spats AND you have to admit, as Flash said above, there is life again in this forum after it was nearly killed off by the incredibly dull daily postings of mykle, pepsoid and galarcherjek.

It wouldn't be fun otherwise would it? It's like having a dirt-clod fight. Visit me http://www.radiodenver.org/

Wow, I landed another one! Hold on a mo - it's the same one I just threw back! Bah. This is what we need: Handy Guide to RadioDenverisms: 'You still talk shit and don't know shit' = Oo, that's it - now I'm really angry. I'm going to put you in your place. You've really done it now. You'll be sorry you messed with my silver tongue. 'I'm just wasting time' = Ditto. 'It is fun to pull your chain' = Ditto. 'I'll bitch-slap you.' = Ditto. 'The truth is, I don't give a flying fuck about you' = Ditto. 'You're a dog/a pack of dogs/it's like watching a pack of dogs/you're nothing more than a small furry dog/this place is full of dogs/small dogs/backyard dogs/yapping dogs/I laugh at dogs/You are all dogs to me' = Ditto. *Any fishing metaphor* = Ditto. ~ I'll Show You Tyrants * Fuselit * The Prowl Log *

Sparto. Why does it bother you that I don't have any work here? You've mentioned it several times. I'm seriously curious about your concern. Do you feel I owe you an explanation? Oh...Pull my finger (wait a minute...let me pull my blue jeans up over my ass crack first) burp Hey, you were starting to fine tune the schtick once it looked like the girls liked you but you keep digressing into the gay boy routine, which I'm sure you're not. It's getting long in the tooth there old boy. Go back three paces, try it again...you almost had it. Visit me http://www.radiodenver.org/

**Interval while RD clears his throat in preparation for rebuffing JC with equal diligence. Place your bets now on references to dogs, shit and fish.** ~ I'll Show You Tyrants * Fuselit * The Prowl Log * Woe's Woe

Hen-dog-fish-shit. I strive to tune my material to the audience at hand. You aren't a challenge. What I'm really waiting for is for you and Sparto to team up on me, which is getting ever so much closer. Then I can take you both out with a single barrage of dirt-clods. Go ahead guys...you know you want to get together, you both have much in common. Visit me http://www.radiodenver.org/

Anyone planning to do a phd on the forums, should first understand the (very basic and commonly known by the average 6 year old) difference between an ISP and an IP. ISP - Many people use the same. IP - dedicated to ONE location.

"I strive to tune my material to the audience at hand." Strive harder - your material is old. 'You aren't a challenge' is another Dragonball Z'ism. ~ I'll Show You Tyrants * Fuselit * The Prowl Log * Woe's Woe

I am me and I am you for I am everything.

Gotta go...mom's calling. Visit me http://www.radiodenver.org/

http://www.koopress.co.uk/speaking.htm I've only just come back to this (following a rather self-indulgent posting session on the recently added list) and I can't stop laughing. Sparta, you may well be the new Stephen Fry but you will never beat Denver anymore than any of us can beat the Archertart because you are dealing with very, very thick skins (you know - more than four) but it is hilarious all the same. Pepsoid, you have created something way beyond your ken, dear boy. *imagines pepsoid googling up barbie dolls*

Ha! I couldn't resist having a curious peek at how this thread is wending, and am astounded at the quality of bitch-slappery and nasty frippery going on! Stormy, petal, you MAY have seen a two-legged donkey on the lawn at Shire Hall; people get married all the time out there in all sorts of hideous costumes, but alas I no longer work in Shire Hall so I don't have the once-held fringe benefit of watching such goings-on. It may have also been a counsellor. Some of them are a bit long in the ears. I am, however, truly devastated that you, an intelligent, talented, middle-aged, happily married man, don't find me attractive, as that was the whole point in me joining ABC. I saw your posts and thought, 'Whoo! There's a stud I'd like to go to pasture with.' All those love poems I wrote? They were for you. Alas, it's not to be. Cath, hun, I got all your hints; I now know the difference between an IP and an ISP and fully admit that I had to ask the husband what the difference was. *You* must know because you spend lots of time peeking into people's Windows. You're still wrong, however, about alternate identities. Fergal was closer, but not quite there. Give it up and have a brandy. It's getting autumnal outside!. I'll leave you guys to your barbs. Flash is right: it IS getting interesting again.

What, that it's a well primed relative with access to your computer? In the almost words of Miss Keeler, "well you WOULD say that, wouldn't you?" "How terribly amusing petal, what fun it is to wind you up, gosh, 'tis just fab to see you wriggle" (In the almost words of a less famous tart)

I have to say I much prefer tart to bitter. At least it's interesting again.

*Factories in China struggle to fulfil rush order of Fleece 2 happy meal toys*

I'm confused, can someone please clarify what is now going on. Is AG saying that someone she knows follows her round logging onto her pc the moment she logs out day and night? Can you put it into simple words because i have got a rotten cold and can't be bothered to read much more after trawling through the floods on recently added. thankyou xx P.s can Fish clarify if zip up fleeces are ok as I wear one down the beach when walking the dog.

"It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for subtelty." Isaac Asimov.

make that "subtlety"

Nope, simpler please I know you can't be refering to AG with the term subtle.

http://www.freewebs.com/michaeljamestreacy/index.htm I've looked at clouds from both sides now, From up and down, and still somehow, It's cloud illusions I recall, I really don't know clouds, at all.

camus ... could you just clarify ... would you be wanting to be sexy whilst walking the dog?

http://www.koopress.co.uk/speaking.htm Ugh, how can you use the words 'sexy' and 'dog walking' in the same sentence? No, don't tell me, use it as an inspiration point. :-)

http://www.koopress.co.uk/speaking.htm Heh, I've only just noticed Mickleberry's comment. Seems like Shackleton still doesn't know his cumulo from his nimbus. Tosser.

Shared IP addresses between PCs are around. It's possible for multiple workstations to share a single IP address via a gateway. Another option is address pooling where 10 IP addresses will be pooled between say 25 PCs and allocated on user demand but the address is not fixed to one machine. However almost all businesses will allocate one single IP address to one single piece of hardware. I don't know about Universities. Of course a home PC will have a single fixed IP but again you could have a wireless network and share that IP between several machines/ users. jude "Cacoethes scribendi" http://www.judesworld.net