Path to 9/11
Bit early for discussion on this, being as it hasn't aired yet (BBC2 Sunday and Monday nights) - but I've been checking up in various places to see what previewing reactions have been. Generally scathing. - 'twisted', 'totally inaccurate', 'factually shaky', politically inflammatory' are just a selection from sources that wouldn't normally be regarded as sensationalist. One critic whose views I normally respect, writing on the IMDB, calls it 'despicable' and 'history rewritten for political gain'.
The most telling reaction came, I think, from the writer and producer. They said their goal was not to make a documentary. As if that absolves them from any responsibility. The mini-series is meant to be based on the report of the 9/11 Commission - but the small print on the credits shows that several books on the subject were also used as source material.
We can only reserve judgement.
One other point, though, is that it's been made by ABC (the other one!), which is owned by the ultra-conservative Disney Corporation. A disclaimer from ABC, acknowledging some of the factual inaccuracies, dismisses them as "composite and representative characters and time compression . . . for dramatic purposes."
As Tom Shales of The Washington Post remarked: "How much more drama does 9/11 need?"
~
www.fabulousmother.co.uk
There's nothing more mind-teasing than the incomprehensible eagerly avowed -
Dennett
Share your state secrets at...
http://www.amerileaks.org
~
www.fabulousmother.co.uk