Bouncing back from an atrocious critique

6 posts / 0 new
Last post
Bouncing back from an atrocious critique

Could anyone share any thoughts or experiences that might be able to assist me here?

(This will no doubt turn out to be long, but is not intended as a whine, so bear with me!)

I recently submitted my third novel (I have written three but had none published), to the Romantic Novelists Association, and have just received it back - along with an extremely damning and patronising critique.

I admit I am heartbroken and dispirited, having derived so much enjoyment from writing that novel and considered it my best novel to date (shows what I know, eh?). I was in no way expecting to be praised to the skies and published, but frankly this report has made me feel humiliated and as though I have no right wasting their time with my crappy manuscripts. I must point out that the RNA critiques I received for my previous two novels were extremely helpful and constructive - whereas I consider this one rather vicious.

However...after a good old cry, I am trying to act positively. Now I don't want to debate what the RNA said, or whether they were right/wrong, and I am not fishing for compliments or reassurance here, just a few ideas on how I might bounce back from something like this.

I really don't want to give up writing as, quite honestly, a huge part of me would die if I did so - but obviously my confidence has been hugely knocked. The thing is I am very goal-driven and always need something to work towards, to spur me on. Well my goals hitherto have been to write a novel every year so that I have something to submit to the RNA (they accept one submission per author per year). I have begun work on a fourth novel, but now I don't feel I should dare submit anything next year.

Some ideas I came up with to regain my flagging motivation:

- Perhaps not renew my membership to the RNA, since I am clearly not good enough for it (I could always attempt to rejoin at a later date) and instead go 'back to the drawing board' and concentrate on learning my craft a bit better by doing a writing course (Open University or similar). Can anyone recommend any courses?

- Give novel-writing a rest for a while and stick to short stories, since they obviously require far less slog and consequent heartache (and I can seek regular feedback from you good folks).

- Still persist with the fourth novel, taking on board the RNA's comments, and bravely submit it for further lambasting next year!

What does anybody else think? If you've read this far, by the way, thank you at least for your persistence!

Leigh

It could be, of course, that the critic was having a bad day. However, one of your alternatives above is: - Still persist with the fourth novel, taking on board the RNA's comments, and bravely submit it for further lambasting next year! which suggests, to me at least, that in spite of the vitriol, there are some valid points in the critique. Probably a combination of all except run away tail between legs from RNA is a feasible option. I have no idea how much time you have to devote to writing. I am lucky being semi-retired and so I write poetry, work on a novel and knock up short stories from time to time. That said, I submit very little to publishers, not considering what I do to be any good. Writing is therapy for me, so perhaps I'm not the person to be giving you advice! Good luck, whatever you decide. Ewan
Take heart from JK Rowling's tale; (whoops, pun!) she sent Harry Potter to 9 publishers before being accepted by Bloomsbury. Bet they are kicking themselves now...

 

I think Ewan had a good point in picking up on the fact that there might be a tad of constructive comment in the response from RNA, and as you present learning from this and resubmitting as an option it suggests to me that you have not been defeated by RNA. Excellent - as what you need now is the , motivation, energy and desire to continue. This will take you through the early days of grieving over the attack and damage to your creation, your baby. I speak really from the experience of an artist and one not unfamiliar with rejection without comment. Generally artists get effusive praise when something is liked and a simple 'you may collect your work on...' if it doesn't fit the brief, the 'culture' of the gallery or whatever. Meanwhile your other option of working on short stories is worth considering. A novel is not better than a collection of stories simply because it is longer. Nor better than a collection of poems for that matter. So maybe short stories or poems are your thing? When the bruising has healed I'm sure you'll instinctively know what you want to do, what is right for your now. in the meantime best wishes for whatever that may be and for your recovery. Margot
Jennifer, Why would you ever think of giving up writing? Perhaps your work was not to someone's liking? So what. Maybe someone else would love it. I use to paper the walls with rejection slips. It gets to be amusing after a time, when the immediate hurt wears off. What most editors are telling you is that they can't use your work right now.Publishing is a business after all, not a philanthropic enterprise. If one of them gets a little porky, that is unusual.Rarely do busy editors take the time to pen a detailed critique.He must have seen some worth in your piece or he/she wouldn't have bothered. Want to prove them wrong? Write something "even better" and get it published so the reviewer can be among the many like those who blew off J.K Rowling. J.X.M
'Jennifer, Why would you ever think of giving up writing?' *looks confused* But I just started again! eh?

 

Topic locked