Righting a wrong
Dear ABCtalers,
Thanks for your heartfelt responses to the inaccuracies of the Telegraph's Arts and Books supplement on Saturday.
We too were a bit upset that they got us all wrong in their review of finalists for the yell.com awards.
Here is our response, let's hope it results in a correction / reappraisal of our worth.
Dear Editor,
I am writing in response to this Saturday’s books in space column, The Telegraph 29th September 2001. Toby Clements refers to the website www.ABCtales.com as one of the sites short-listed for the yell.com awards. Though his piece was brief he made a number of errors, the most concerning of which was the statement ‘Unlike The Big Issue, it [ABCtales.com] has no charitable aim’.
I would like to point out that ABCtales, whilst not a charity, is a social venture whose main aim is to effect change by providing a website that empowers people to write and express themselves. We believe that everyone has as story to tell and therefore publish everyone’s writing for free online. We send tale-catchers out to sections of the community that we feel are under-represented and publish their stories on the site and we provide a further publishing opportunity in our free national print magazine ABCtales, for which the writer gets paid.
In addition, ABCtales has had a commitment from the outset to donate 20 per cent of its profits to The Big Issue’s Social Development Fund which aims to help homeless people move on from homelessness and into mainstream employment. We also sponsor Street Lights the section of The Big Issue that publishes homeless people’s creative writing.
What’s more, ABCtales seeks to provide employment opportunities to homeless people wherever possible. We are a small team but so far a third of our staff have been former Big Issue vendors, one of whom has since moved on to permanent employment.
Finally, I would also like to draw Mr Clement's attention to the lively discussion forums that exist on the website. I felt that his piece did ABCtales.com a further disservice when he stated that another site on the shortlist was ‘much better’ citing as his reasons that ‘you can join the discussion, and you can vote for a book you want to discuss in the coming weeks’. Did he miss this central aspect of our site where people are invited to discuss and critique not only published authors works but each other’s original writing as well?
In conclusion, I would ask you to ask Mr Clements to revisit our site and request that you rectify the errors made by him about the social ethics of ABCtales - so central to our business – for your readers, many of whom are writers on our site.
Yours sincerely,
Lisa Mangan
Communications Director