FREE VERSE
I have recently subsrcibed to 'The New Writer'
Magazine and entered some of my poems for the competitions run by them
On receiving my first copy I discovered many poems either by winners of previous competitions or highly commended.
Whilst I found quite a few good poems I was extremely surprised and not a little concerned to note that without exception every poem was written in free verse.
Don't misunderstand me. Some poetry works very well in free verse but every entry?
Does this indicate that to win a competition you have got to write in that style?
Alright. I'm old fashioned. I together with many of my fellow members of the local poetry and creative writing groups prefer poems that rhyme.
I still can't help feeling that free verse is something of a cop out by people who can't be bothered.
None of the early great poets wrote in free verse.
I don't think Wordsworth's 'Daffodils' would have had the success it had if it did not rhyme.
When I was young it was poetry if it rhymed and prose if it didn't and everyone knew where they stood. I don't quite subscribe to that definition but surely there is room for both.
I was pleased to see that at least some of your contributors have written poems that rhyme and, (the other comments I hear) that ordinary people can understand and enjoy.
M
http://www.ukauthors.com
http://www.ukapress.com
Parson Thru
Oh look, a link. I wonder where it leads.
JoHn
Linda
Parson Thru
http://www.ukauthors.com
http://www.ukapress.com
M
Linda
johng
Linda
http://www.ukauthors.com
http://www.ukapress.com
johng
johng
http://www.ukauthors.com
http://www.ukapress.com