The Limitations of Learning
I'm currently reading a book on Buddhist philosophy, in which there's a discussion about the limitations of learning.
It argues that the first limitation is that learning is basically self-centred. A person's goal, through education, is self-betterment, perhaps even enlightenment ' but this is largely for his or her own sake. As such, learning has a strong tendency to deteriorate into the world of Anger (one of the Ten Worlds identified in Buddhist thinking) ' "of separating oneself from other people and looking down on them.
The second limitation is that those who have attained a high level of learning often find it extremely difficult to accept that the conclusions they have come to may not be wholly correct, so differences of opinion may need to be settled by reference to agreed and accepted norms. But¦
"In the non-scientific world, there is a lack of agreement on the framework of reference itself. A communist and a capitalist, or an atheist and a Muslim, have immense difficulty even in recognising each other's vision of the world, no matter how learned or erudite they may be.
The quote concludes:
"One characteristic of the TRULY wise man is that he can recognise the wisdom in others and is more concerned in discovering the truth of any situation than in simply defending his own opinion.
In the light of some pretty lively recent discussion threads, I wondered what people thought about this...
~It's a maze for rats to try, it's a race for rats to die.~
The All New Pepsoid the Second!
~It's a maze for rats to try, it's a race for rats to die.~
The All New Pepsoid the Second!
The All New Pepsoid the Second!
The All New Pepsoid the Second!
The All New Pepsoid the Second!
The All New Pepsoid the Second!
The All New Pepsoid the Second!
The All New Pepsoid the Second!
The All New Pepsoid the Second!
The All New Pepsoid the Second!