Downton Abbey

 

Nostalgia is good for you. Americans it seem love Downton Abbey and weep over the history they never had. Nostalgia sells. I should know that better than most. Writing is an act of nostalgia, an attempt to capture the past that’s never been, or to re-create the past as we remember it. This can be applied equally to fact or fiction. Downton Abbey is  set on that golden past when everybody knew their place. The master was always right, even when he was wrong. Everybody dressed up, even the servants, especially the servants, for we would never want to confuse them with people that mattered, people with the right kind of education and accent, people that knew which fork and knife to use, people that bought other people and made them bow and scrape in their presence, people that made those socially below them use secret doors and tunnels underneath their Gothic piles, built and maintained by other people that didn’t matter, so that they could avoid sharing the air with people that really mattered, those same people that mattered who required help to get dressed and cleaned, people that needed other people to stand to attention and hand them the right spoon and fork, people that never bent down when they dropped something, people that had their trouser pockets sewn shut, because they never needed to carry anything,  lived in luxury, as was their due, people that didn’t like Johnny Foreigner much, were suspicious of women that wanted anything more that to dress well and undress when required, and hated the workshy even more, people who believed that some people have a God given right to punish the poor for their sins, to enforce a moral code that didn’t apply to people like them, to fight for what they believed in, or at least employ the right sort of people to fight for what they believed in, which was, of course, the rights of maintaining their wealth and property.

You probably guessed I’ve never seen an episode of Downton Abbey and you’d be right. I’d be waiting for the servants to poison the soup and rid us of these parasitic growths. I don’t need to watch Downton Abbey. We are returning to the eighteenth and nineteenth century narratives of the rich employing increasingly more servants to maintain their big piles. Narratives of the rich being so much better deserving than the poor.  Having servants to shop and clean, and bring their children up, speaks of a certain kind of class.  Truth is crueler than fiction.

http://unbound.co.uk/books/lily-poole

 

Comments

Can't bring myself to watch it. There's no desire to go there. Picking up on your point about servants raising children - still can't get my head round paying others to look after your kids day in, day out. I can't do the maths.

 

simple Vera, kiss the kids on the forehead after they've been bathed and are shiny and new, put them back in the box, go back to doing what you were doing. 

 

I have never got round to watching it either. There a certain targeting to our Sunday night viewing options; we get all these drivelly Little England costume dramas must go down a treat after our roast beef/warm beer on the village cricket green/oh the days the days nostalgia fakery machine.

those are the kind of things that sell Elsie. 

 

Downton Abbey is well written and very enjoyble (if you have the time of course). I think it does get inside the heads of the class that used to have everything, and the classes that worked for them. To do that as well as this is quite an achievement. We can see that the aristocrats of this period are becoming more subject to the opinions and influences of ordinary citizens, and the class system is already beginning to break down. We can also see that within the constraints of the society they find themselves in most of them seem to be quite good people behaving as well as they can. I think there probably has been plenty of truth in this depiction, despite the unfairness of the class system. All society is an evolution, and we are all constrained by the society we live in.

each to their own Kurt. Society is evolving. Around the 1900 when the series was orginally set the aristocracy owned 90% of all the goods and serivces in any one year that the country produced. 10% was shared between the other 90% of the population. Slowly and surely we are going back to those times. The First and Second World Wars were shocks to the system, but money goes to money and there's nothing natural about it. I find this dressed up soaps offensive. 

 

I do agree with you about the economics. Society was very unfair back in 1900, and despite inheritance taxes and the forcing of the aristocrats out of their stately homes unless they open them to the tourism business, it still is. Many of the rich have put their money into other investments over the years. Landlordism is of course still the way many of the rich keep and increase their wealth. Perhaps the ownership of land should finally be nationalised. Then the idle rich would really have the carpet pulled from under them. Unfortunately in Britain property and the rules of ownership are utterly sacred and no party can even suggest the unthinkable. Of course new classes of indolent rich are being created all the time, like lottery winners, lording it over the impecunious workers. It is a sad world, and justice has to be constantly worked towards.

society is unfair today Kurt. Different scams, same old faces. sorry for going on so much.