What I Read On Holiday, Especially Dan Brown

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
What I Read On Holiday, Especially Dan Brown

Here's the full list:

"Marrying Buddha" by Wei Hui (follow-up to "Shanghai Baby")
"Man And Boy" by Tony Parsons
"The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle" by Haruki Murakami
"Digital Fortress" by Dan Brown

in that order.

The first three had much to commend them, especially in terms of relationships, sexual, familial and dysfunctional respectively, and in each I found a lot of memorable poetic and emotional writing.

So when I got to Dan Brown (very famous novelist of "The Da Vinci Code") I was shocked to find how appalling a book it was, full of cliche and hackneyed writing, more simplistic than Mills and Boon in its hero couple, lots of tossing out of research snippets, sneering American judgments on any culture other than its own, fatuous "cryptic" enigmas, oh, it's horrible, horrible ... more shocking still were the plaudits from American magazines and the revelation that this guy used to teach creative writing. Am I over-reacting to what's nothing more than mindless sunbed fodder and doesn't pretend otherwise or does anyone else agree that this is a very poor writer over-hyped?

Cardenio
Anonymous's picture
I agree completely. Not read the first two but The Wind-Up Bird is marvellous and Dan Brown, as i have said before, is my enemy. If someone said, to me 'I like trash so I read Dan Brown,' that's fine. I like some trash too, But this idea that his books have MERIT, like they deserve to be recognised as *draws breath* contemporary classics - now that gets my blood boiling. I won't be responsibe for my actions if I have to suffer one more converstation that includes, "Oh, Ben, so you like good books....You know, I've been reading Dan Brown...." ~CaRDeNio~
The shocking thing about Dan Brown is that it's not even good trash. Even by the meagre standards of thrillers (sympathetic characters and thrilling plots,) it doesn't succeed. It seriously makes you question people's reasons for buying books. I wouldn't claim to know everyone's mind, but my suspicion is that people read it because they think it's clever and tricky. Paste in a few famous mysteries from Wikipedia, and the odd regurgitated mind puzzle, and people approach it as something a bit fiendish. It's like Sudoku. Good literature makes you think too much about issues and complex matters. Dan Brown is like a book of family brain teasers. Anyone remember Quiz Kids? It was a bi-weekly comic based around a generic Enid Blyton style kids story, with the twist that each page had a crossword or spot the difference to solve, dumped into the story. It's the same formula, I think. As far as I'm concerned, his success is the green light to every one who wants to be a writer, no matter how crap, to keep trying, because it proves some editors and many readers will fall for anything. You're in with as much of a chance if you're a bad novelist as you are if you're a decent one - maybe even a better one.
Topic locked