I before E...

33 posts / 0 new
Last post
I before E...

The BBC featured the debate over teaching spelling rules heavily this morning, pointing out to all and sundry that 'well, "i before e except after c" is all very well as far as it goes.'

I was very pleased to note that they were inundated by texts, e-mails etc. from people who actually knew the whole mnemonic rhyme:

I before E
Except after C
when making the sound 'ee'.

Unfortunately the airheads on the sofa still persisted in saying it didn't work for words like 'ancient', which, with the best will in the world, has no sound 'ee' (like see/sea/wee) in it. At best there's an 'uh' but it's probably a schwah.

Still worse though, the spelling expert appeared to be unaware of the rest of the rhyme, as was the primary school headteacher.

The spelling expert seemed intent on apologising for the apparently capricious nature of English spelling, going so far as to advocate an adoption of phonetic spelling since that would make it easier to learn.

However, that will mean goodbye to visual puns, eye-rhymes and all manner of word-play. English is a bastard hybrid of Latin, Old Germanic, Norse and - goodness me - Britannic influences with the odd bit of Anglo-Saxon thrown in. That's why it probably has the largest vocabulary of any language in the world.

Good luck to everyone who believes spelling doesn't matter, but get rid of traditional spelling and the rich variety of English will not be quite so impressive.

I look forward to the living language, if it's used that way, it is that way argument.

It's vital to stay up to date Ewan. Think of the exciting new decimal coinage. So much easier and more efficient. Bugger, you caught me in mid-edit.
Dessimul, surely?
Shawly.
Shirley.
Rite.
Orl Krekt.
Keith? I pronounce it 'Keeth' ... or does the rule not stretch to proper nouns? jude

 

Anything goes with names of people and places. Reith as in Lord Reith. Dalkeith, Leith. Mind you, they're all Scottish.
Anyway, don't most people pronounce it 'Keef'?
"Still worse though, the spelling expert appeared to be unaware of the rest of the rhyme, as was the primary school headteacher". The former surprises me but not the latter. My sister is a deputy head. To become a teacher you need a degree and a PGCE and only a C grade in O level/ GCSE English. My sister's degree is in music, she isn't academic at all. One can assume the headteacher qualification doesn't include any basic literacy since I know lots of teachers who don't have a clue. Too many people are semi-literate airheads with delusions of being well-educated just because they have a degree. In my work, whenever I employ a new member of administrative staff, I have to give them literacy tests as part of their interview. This usually involves giving them a dictated letter on Dictaphone to type up after I have disabled the spell-checker in the word processing programme. I also include lots of commonly misused words such as 'where, were and we're' and 'their, there and they're'. I also request they sign off appropriately to see if they know when to use faithfully rather than sincerely. What I find depressing is that few people under the age of forty come anywhere close to a perfect score. My spelling isn't the best but at least I understand the rules and I know when to check if I am unsure. What would be really useful is a literacy society a bit like Mensa, where you are tested under exam conditions. Membership of this would save employees having to administer tests themselves. If membership gave employees a competitive edge, more people might take the time to learn grammar, punctuation and spelling.

 

'My spelling isn't the best' Whose is? 'but at least I understand the rules' I think generations of grown-up children have been cheated of this understanding because more than one generation of teachers has told them it isn't important. The lack of this understanding and the availabilty of the extremely fallible spellchecker means it doesn't occur to them to buy a dictionary, much less use it. I gained my degree recently courtesy of the OU. I can tell you that people get absolutely murdered for poor spelling and badly reasoned (usually due to poor grammar and punctuation usage) arguments in assignments for the OU. Even so, I have met alumni of so-called benchmark universities who would have been considered barely literate when I left school. People tend to poke fun at MENSA, because it's a matter of membership, rather than an independent qualification. I guess they would do the same to any literacy society. Perhaps what's needed is something like the old RSA secretarial skills qualifications, only for literacy.
"I think generations of grown-up children have been cheated of this understanding because more than one generation of teachers has told them it isn't important." That's why I thank God for dear old Mrs Pavi who taught me for one year when I was aged 8 to 9. She passed on two things - the importance of correct English and a love of literature, especially poetry. Even twenty years ago she was a dying breed. I also had two very good English teachers in my first two years of secondary school but after that it was awful. However, since the seed was planted I took it upon myself to teach myself later on in life. In fact, I would say much of my learning from eighteen to starting my MA aged thirty was remedial, compensating for a very poor state education, not in some inner city deprived area but a leading Catholic comprehensive in an expensive area of Surrey. It is really quite shameful and inexcusable. jude

 

Well, actually there's no need. Veil is (vail), so not 'ee' and if you tried viel it would be (veel) which is actually spelled veal. So that's clear isn't it. :-) Please name something which is not a proper noun or foreign word, which does contravene the rule as far as it goes. I'd like to hear it.
Karl Wiggins (an old regular on this site) always said the most useful thing he learned at school were the times tables. As a contruction manager he said it made his life much easier, instantly knowing what seven twelves are. Fortunately, times tables are still on the national curriculum, for now anyway. Similarly, everyone needs basic letter writing and other literacy skills. If the fireman wants to progress to be station chief or whatever they call it, he will need to be literate. I put in a complaint about my local housing office for sending me a letter which was so lacking in literacy standard, it was disgusting. You could argue, it didn't matter because the meaning could be deciphered, but it does matter because I found it insulting (to be sent something that bad in terms of spelling, grammar and punctuation, I am not implying the meaning was insulting). jude

 

Unfortunately, that is too true. I wept when I saw a cauldron for sale in a pagan shop window in Glastonbury for 2K. TWO GRAND! It beggars belief. Our only hope is cognitive enhancement, sadly the realm of sci-fi at present. jude

 

Oof! Laughed so much I almost had a seizure! Any more, I wonder? Seize is from Old French etymologically speaking; perfect, I can blame the French! Frieze is ok Siege is ok... God, I'm going to waste a whole day looking for exceptions. LOL
What do you mean, NWB? Maybe the 'rule' is punctuated wrongly. You are right, friend is 'frend': but the 'rule' is only about the sound 'ee'. Even so there are the other exceptions, seize, codeine etc. I called it a mnemonic in any case, which is not quite a rule. It doesn't say - I before E and forever it shall be when making any vowel sound in the English Language except after C - does it? So eye-rhymes are modernist rubbish, are they? I think it's right that we spell things inconsistently, but for entirely different reasons. Great to hear from you again. Ewan
Wipes tear from eye... No, not so catchy, but I'm grateful to it all the same. Hmm... Modernist = 20th Century? I think I'll go retro and start pronouncing eye-rhymes as full rhymes. Just to prove, it's you I love. Is wife-beating National Socialism different from the common-or-garden sort? Don't think Goering would have gone for it somehow.
I started primary school in 1960. The priority back then was on the 'three R's'; Reading, Writing and Arithmatic - which considering that only one of them started with an 'R' was a bit bloody confusing straight away. With regard to reading and writing the emphasis was initially put on what was considered the fundamentals i.e. spelling, punctuation, tenses (past, present, future). I stress that punctuation was initially confined to 'Full stops' and 'Capital letters' and travelled a fairly shallow learning curve from there. When going through my children's homework, I noticed a consistent lack of emphasis on these so-called fundamentals, particularly spelling. I approached the various teachers with regard to same. I was informed that, it was felt that dedicating an inordinate amount of time to correction of misspellings and/or tenses curtailed the young pupils expressive licence; it basically held them back! So a sentence that read: 'I will b cumin from dare yesterde' should not be fussed over because the meaning was fairly clear and the expression was of more import than the grammar, spelling or tense; ridiculous! I find the 'Americanisation' of the 'English' dictionary rather annoying too. For my part I feel that having your 'arse kicked' should (even at this base level) mean, having your bum impacted by somebody's foot whereas having your 'ass kicked' should inform that, some reprobate has assaulted your donkey. It would also appear that any word that we can 'make up' - as long as it becomes popular/fashionable and much used - is eligible to become entered in the English dictionary. I realise that language has evolved and will continue to do so but; New Words in the Concise Oxford English Dictionary: noogie n. N. Amer. informal an instance of rubbing a person's head with one's knuckles, as a prank or to express affection. please!!!!!! Maybe I am old fashioned, maybe I'm totally wrong but what do you think? p.s. Amongst all the toys and 'playstation' games last Christmas, I bought my young kids a really good dictionary and there is five euro reward up for grabs every week in our house for the most interesting word and best explanation - runner up gets 2 euro and 3rd gets 1 euro. Anyone with kids, try it! It's actually fun!!
"Amongst all the toys and 'playstation' games last Christmas, I bought my young kids a really good dictionary ..." Whilst I agree entirely in principle, I am terrified of ending up like 'Victorian Dad' in the Viz cartoon strip. In one episode he gives his children a stick and hoop as a Christmas present and tells them they will be attending church service for "three hours of hypocrisy in sub zero temperatures" but only after he has administered their daily beating. I remember the resentment I harboured towards my own father who outlawed television and Mcdonalds and all other things that corrupt and gave us piles of second hand books in our stockings. I think it is a case of balance. Glad to hear that you gave them the toys and playstation games as well Shamrock! jude

 

Were Reading so bad - even then - that a goal could merit a ballad?
Yea well, old Oscar also equated a 'gay day' to sitting round naked with a few lads, sharing a hard-on. Which was quite progressive of its time when you consider that most of his peers would have immediately thought of a picnic by the river.
I'd rather eat that stupid cardboard box it comes in than a Big Mac.
Was one of Oscars mates called Big Mac? Well he was Irish.
I like McDonalds. I had a very nice Texan burger on Saturday. Some people don't like the food which is fine. Others don't like Global Corporations which is, to an extent, also fine. The people who annoy me though are the 'food snobs' who only boycott fast food because of its association with a lower cultural capital. These are usually the same people who think going to the Proms' last night or wandering around an art exhibition plugged into one of those audio guides is classy. Ha ha! jude

 

I just think it's very poor food. I'd rather make my own burgers, and do.
Valid reason! I didn't think you were a claphamite food snob, there aren't too many of those around here fortunately. I agree that homemade burgers are nicer but I spend entire days traipsing around jumble sales buying books and if I want hot food on the go, fast food gives best value for money. I don't think the food is poor. It isn't the best, but I still like it. So does my former Michelin restaurant chef boyfriend. I'd rather pay <£3 for a burger than £6 for a rustic sun-dried tomato bloomer sandwich from some shitty organic lifestyle deli. jude

 

Well, there is that. It's criminal the premium people feel entitled to charge based on the use of certain words and phrases; 'organic', 'free-range' or 'healthy option'. It's not even as if they are true except in some kind of lip-servicable way that enables even more squeezing out of profit. It's a shame people don't have time to cook, though.
I do and often take a packed lunch but alas the portable microwave for something hot has yet to be invented though I'm sure the Japanese are working on it. jude

 

Got one.... heinous. It could be argued that 'neither' counts but only if you say it 'neether' rather than 'niyther'. jude

 

Wot evva!

 

Eee I give up!
Topic locked