A party game!

9 posts / 0 new

Topic locked

Sat, 2012-03-03 11:59

A party game!

Love and lust - are they really distinct?

Background: I was talking to this woman recently (mid-thirties, awesome tits!!) and she was saying that her current toyboy (mid-twenties, tits? don't know! really - is there no decorum!!??) was cool and everything, but he wasn't that amorous if you get her drift. Anyways, she (Ms Awesome) questioned the lack of thrust, so to speak, with bedroom activity with him directly and in person (possibly in the bedroom - I didn't ask), and he said that it derived from his deep love of/for her. The imp;lication seemed to be that, if he felt lust for her, then he clearly didn't feel love for her to quite the same degree as he did evidently do now from his lack of lust for her.

Legal stuff: this discussion is open to anyone who is willing to take part. If you are not willing to take part, then that is your expression of your own positive liberty and not to be questioned by me or others with an interest in your non-involvement.

Religious stuff: ???

Sat, 2012-03-03 15:22

animan

WOT? x2

Sat, 2012-03-03 18:30

Highhat

no comment x 10

Sat, 2012-03-03 18:31

Highhat

this is definitely not for girls women females or dogs or awful poets

Sat, 2012-03-03 18:44

TheShyAssassin

He must be a wanker.

Sat, 2012-03-03 21:37

Highhat

Jesus is lacklustre. You keep an eye on him foots and I'll be watching seagulls. Especially the huge and enormous ones. They are SO fascinating. The way they flap their lustrous wings and stand on rooftops with their luscious webbed FEET . Yegods a sight for sore thumbs.

Sat, 2012-03-03 23:04

Highhat

seems like a civilised barter . . . . But sunbeam or not I do not wish to be sold to Jesus trade. This is an illustrious business. I do not prefer camels either. I know I am difficult but Jesus must lust someone else with his sunbeams. I don't own a driver's license either. The long of the short: Jesus must go elsewhere with his wonderful sunbeams. Pity . Could we please sing a song Now?

Tue, 2012-03-06 11:36

animan

Well, footsie, I didn't mean 'are they identical?' but rather 'do they necessarily have no relationship to each other ever?' Or, to put it another way, 'does lust necessarily mean desire without love?' However, I can see how my question was open to your interpretation. If the question, as hopefully clarified a bit here, still seems like offering a kind of a green light for paedophilia, then do let me know.

Tue, 2012-03-06 15:32

animan

Well, maybe they are, according to some, and maybe they shouldn't be? Or, if they are according to the dictionary, maybe we need to create a new word where they aren't? Footsie, is it mutual?? x

Topic locked