Guns & Brains

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
Guns & Brains

It has recently occurred to me how wise and knowledgeable supposedly “normal” people in novels often are. In the latest book I am reading, for example (Stephen Baxter’s “Transcendent”), one of the protagonists sits next to someone on a plane, who proceeds to speak to him about aspects of Gaia Theory. Admittedly, in this case, it is someone who sells excrement recycling plants for a living, so I suppose it would make sense, in order to authenticate his sales pitch, for him to appear to have genuine relevant background knowledge on his product… but… I do seem to often come across a character – a policeman or whatever – who randomly inserts quotes from philosophers etc into conversations with his colleagues. Is it just that, in order for a novel to be interesting/readable, at least one of its central characters must be of higher than average intelligence? I suppose it wouldn’t do for your sensitive-yet-troubled-and-with-a-dark-and-complex-past hero to go on at length about the latest Big Brother evictions or the weather or his indignation at being lumped with an exorbitant installation charge for his Sky+ HD digi-box…

Has anyone else noticed this tendency, or conversely, can anyone provide any particular examples which prove me wrong?

pe
ps
oid

Blogs!
"the art of tea"
"that's an odd courgette"

I've also noticed this, but I have a sort-of explanation. My book, Coombe's Wood, has had an overhaul by a professional editor. The first thing she said was that I couldn't have a lovably thick main character. So her IQ went up. Apparently, to really get into a book, the readers have to be able to get into the shoes of the main character. And readers don't want to feel dumb, they want to escape into a reality where they are possibly more intelligent than they actually are. Same goes for size. I wanted an overweight normal gal, like many of the brits are now. I was given the same reasoning behind not over-emphasising her weight.
It wouldn't at all surprise me if Colin Dexter had set off this trend with Inspector Morse's banging on about Milton's Paradise Lost all the time! I seem to remember Sherlock and Mycroft Holmes being the geniuses of past sleuthing. And they didn't pontificate about Aristotle's theories on politics, as far as I can remember. I expect any reader wouldn't want to follow the meanderings of a dullard for several hundred pages, to be sure. But academic brilliance is only one way of spicing up your characters, surely? Bond is suave. Poirot is arrogant. Charteris' Saint is debonair. And so it goes on... My webpage is at: http://www.bookscape.co.uk
Topic locked