Relativity

13 posts / 0 new
Last post
Relativity

It thought it might be nice to have a thread about little old grannies or troublesome siblings but instead since I’m even more brain dead than usual at the moment I thought we might discuss relativity.
Now I know there are many super science types out there all clued up on Dark Mass and Dark Energy and other such fictions and I’d be grateful if one of them could try to explain in the simplest terms whether or not energy is ever actually transformed into matter or simply into extra mass.
Now I know there have been many experiments where energy has seemingly created particles but as I remember the current theory allows for particles to pop into and out of existence regardless of energy input... so that’s no great feat.
So what I’m getting at is have scientists ever actually created anything material from energy – you know the sort of beam me up Scotty transporter sort of thing where energy is actually converted into a physical entity which you could touch.
The idea of using entangled particles to recreate a physical copy– a perfect clone – at a distant location is rather entertaining but is it actually just another dream?
Talking of entangled particles since they seem to have the property of instant communication wouldn’t that contradict Einstein’s theory which states that no information can travel faster than the speed of light? Yes, I know, it’s already been proved to be false via quantum tunnelling but the quality of the information that can be transmitted in this way has been disputed.
Probably childish questions but any answers would be appreciated.

While I'm at it - some of you might remember me banging on about it NOT BEING a square world on the threads a few months ago... here's how Wiki puts it :- Curvature : Solutions to the equations of general relativity or another theory of gravity (such as supergravity), often result in encountering points where the metric blows up to infinity. However, many of these points are in fact completely regular. Moreover, the infinities are merely a result of using an inappropriate coordinate system at this point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Not entirely sure about this since I am not a physicist but I can say that the Horizon programme presented by Prof Brian Cox the other week was superb. He is so much more appealing talking about time and space than he was playing keyboard for d:ream ('Things can only get better' el NuLabour) . jude "Cacoethes scribendi" http://www.judesworld.net

 

I ought to clarify a few points as I was quite off colour when I posted yesterday. Entangled particles are claimed to be able to 'communicate' instantaneously over vast distances. It seems that the problem of actually being able to tell what state they are in has been solved and so they would make pefect candidates for a 'transporter device' should a means to actually create matter (rather than just destroy it) prove feasible. However, giving it some thought it probably depends on whethr the Universe is analog or digital because if it is analog then the past probably plays a huge part in the 'now' and just as a picture of the solar system would not produce orbiting planets neither would a matter scan reproduce a replica.
Mind you there is no guarantee that a digital universe would either but there is a greater chance that a Universe with a 'clock pulse' (so to speak) would carry enough information in each moment to enable the 'clone' to continue in its new location just as it might in the old (all other things being equal). Interesting to wonder what would happen if you were teleported in your sleep - but that's a self concious question :O)
I read something along the lines of them (the scientists) doing it (teleporting particles) and something else about how it'll make computers faster.

~It's a maze for rats to try, it's a race for rats to die.~

Don't beleve everything you read Yan. I'm not convinced that either Quantum computers or teleportation are possible despite the Canadian company D-Wave systems claim to have demonstrated a working quantum computer a couple of years ago. Anyone know of an actual working Quantum computer that is positively real? I note that Wiki says If large-scale quantum computers can be built - suggesting perhaps that small ones can. However I suspect they mean that certain quantum operations can be carried out but not everything needed to make a fully functioning computer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computer
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3811785.stm I hope this helps in your journey :)

~It's a maze for rats to try, it's a race for rats to die.~

Thanks Yan... I'm off now. Yayyyyyyyy ;O)
Don't forget to pack your brain ;)

~It's a maze for rats to try, it's a race for rats to die.~

I always pack at least 2 Yan... so I'm always ready to change my mind.
*Wonders how the hell he ended up on a Science forum* (-: Hey, did you u guys all have a nice new year... (-;
Here are the answers - but what were the questions? http://www.prachatai.com/english/news.php?id=923
Topic locked