The Luddite Hypothesis
By drkevin
- 113 reads
We all know that the Luddites smashed mechanical looms to save their craft based jobs. We also know that they failed to stop weaving automation, but did in fact witness a compensatory growth in employment as many other industries sprang up around the country. Fueled by cheap labour and vast natural resources in the colonies, Britain became the richest country in the world by 1850.
But things do indeed change.
These days we are 2.8 trillion pounds in sovereign debt and we have long since been undercut by the cheap labour and vast natural resources elsewhere. Employment has shifted to services, which (with the exception of international financial services) have largely spent money, rather than earnt it. Now these employers are in the economic cross hairs, as government loans become more expensive, workers opt out and tax revenue falls. Only service cuts or delusional ideas of economic growth can save the day.
Except for AI.
Perhaps we can remain afloat by providing all our basic needs with hyper efficient computer technology and obliging robots?
But what will the population do with themselves then? Talk a lot, watch sport, quizz shows, sink into gaming addiction, worry, contrive artificial 'challenges', get fat.
Sounds wonderful!
Could, perhaps, the Luddites be right in the end? Is it time to say...
STOP.
- Log in to post comments
Comments
Missing the point
This is a pet topic of mine and it is actually addressed in my latest book, Waylaid in Redro, extract published here yesterday.
The protagonist of my story is an artificially conscious teddy bear, devoid of sexual impluses and the need to eat, Chorkie Walker is able to cut through this debate with an alternative world view. Hint: it does not depend on economic growth but personal growth.
itdependswhichwayyoulookatit
- Log in to post comments