Deconstructing Context 3

A more curious and wonderful deconstruction of context has resulted in the foregoing of all groups. After all, if you keep on deconstructing context, then the final context is the individual. Here, any generalization disappears altogether. Ideas are generalizations so ideas disappear.

One only makes remarks about the specific. There is no "Pencil" but only pencils. We enter a "Nabokovian" Universe.

If there are no ideas, then the senses are Supreme. The World is a world of Darwinian changes, eternally changing and wonderful, terrible to behold.

Now women are able to define themselves based on individual additions to their sense of identity. No longer is there any Idea of "Woman" holding them back. It is essentially an existential, Darwinian Universe.

Now, there is only one Universe but it is our beliefs about the Universe that create the Vision of the Universe for us. So, as there are many differing beliefs about the Universe, so we may say there are Pluraverses.

This Nabokovian, Darwinian, existential Universe may seem like a Paradise to some, but I wonder, is there any conscious choice without ideas or are we just caught in the flow of universal Intentionality or Will?

As for our senses, our stereotypes of races are already introjected into our senses through our stereotypical ideas. Can they be so easily separated?

Can human beings handle an eternally changing Universe without any sense of permanence, order, and stability? Or do we go insane?

There seems to be so much free will, but is our will truly free without ideas?