Political Correctness in America 2

It is not difficult to see where political correctness began and it has expanded its reach beyond the academia. If anyone has seen "One Flew Over the Cockoo's Nest," Nurse Hatchett is political correctness. It is emotionalism, creativity, and individuality that political correctness is against. From the Marxist, anthropological angle, political correctness seemingly assumes that everyone is equal but different. How is everyone equal. There are people who try harder than others, study harder, and are smarter than others. There are people who are more emotionally intelligent than others. No one is actually equal in any sense with another. People are only equal in the eyes of God or the law. And if everyone is equal, why are there hierarchies in all cultures? These academics should promote open admission policies to the best universities and hey, why not have a ghetto culture at Harvard? The simple fact is, most of these academics have never seen the ghetto, probably have mostly white friends, and have a condescending niceness toward minorities. I really think we should ship these academics to some tribe in Africa and see how they fare. And mind you, they are not just white academics saying this, but minorities too. In fact, this anthropological, Marxist angle I see in Korean churches and many other minority establishments. The sheer stupidity of such a generalization never strikes people as absolutely silly. They are literally trying to create a Marxist paradise with each group achieving its own objective. It never occurs to these people that each group may in general try to dominate all the other groups. Now, I must concede here that races have become more equal over time and even the superiority of the white race has been shot by the fact that Geniuses cannot exist in a Postmodern culture. The prime movers have more or less disappeared. Now, what kind of person does political correctness aim to create? And do humans have a right to shape and form human beings? With the introduction of Eastern ideas into the Western Psyche in the 1950's and 60's, we have Western Individuals who are really like tyrants or dictators, Steve Jobs was one of those. Many academics in East Asians studies are more or less dictators without power. Some of these individuals mistakenly believe that humans are a "tabula rasa." Tabula Rasa is the basis of Deism and Freemasonism and these academics completely ignore Jungian psychology, the fact that Hollywood has become increasingly anti-historical and mythical, and the rebellion of the 1960's and 1970's in which many minorities were rebelling against stereotypes that reduces them to one singular section of the human psyche. So what is the image that politically correct theorists have of the human being? It is hard to say sometimes, but I think that they want to get rid of sexuality altogether and have neuter people. It's these same people who want to get rid of "He" in the Bible referring to God and replace it as "It." Have human beings ever lived as an IT? What exactly is it? They are really subconsciously promoting bisexuality. And if so, again, you get human sexuality, even stronger sexuality. Politically correct people want people to be nice and not say mean things about other races. Just be nice. But niceness is tricky. You can speak softly but carry a big stick. Someone may be nice to you, but they may mean, "If you don't get out of my way, I'm going to kill you." So you can't be rude. So who are these people targeting? Racial sterotypes of Jews, Koreans, and Blacks. We are RUDE. Why can't we behave? But society is rotten. IT gives me a raw deal. I don't want to acculturate. Political correctness is the leftist version of acculturation. It's not only that that bothers me about political correctness, but it's apparent inequalities. For instance, if an Asian academic seduces a student, God forbid, all hell has broken loose. But if someone further up the social pecking order seduces a student, well, it's a pat on the back for him. Not that I care. I really don't believe that academics should seduce students but it happens.