Illicit Love (IP)
By L G Meadows
Sun, 25 Sep 2011
- 5825 reads
29 comments
You come to me
When the sky is indigo blue
We embrace
You murmur words of love
Long into the night
Come the slate grey morning
You arise quietly
As not to disturb me
But I hear your movements
Watch you with sleep heavy eyes
Collect your clothes and dress
Concealing your collar
I see you perform your ritual
Spectacles, testicles
Wallet and watch
You will leave no traces
Except that which seeps from me
Your ritual of blessing
For me? For you?
I never know
But I wonder
If you find it best
For some confessions
To go unexpressed
- Log in to post comments
Comments
A brilliant, and poignant
Permalink Submitted by Silver Spun Sand on
A brilliant, and poignant take on the IP, LGM;-)
Tina
- Log in to post comments
If in doubt, I always rate
Permalink Submitted by Silver Spun Sand on
If in doubt, I always rate it the next notch up;-)
- Log in to post comments
Nice one LGM. Perhaps the
Nice one LGM.
Perhaps the next he visits you, cut off his testicles.
Only three things to cross then.
ScoZen
- Log in to post comments
Neat. Clever. Languid and
Neat. Clever. Languid and tense. Sinuous, detached.
Jung says that man (as in male), when in love or receiving love, feels compelled to confess/reveal the worst of himself. It's a drive apparently. Maybe that's significant, maybe that's what's troubling you, or maybe J's plain wrong. (Jung: 'Aspects of the Feminine' - someone's title, not mine)
line 4: you murmur?
Laura Marling's 'Rambling Man' is an amusing critique of what can (underlined) happen when a geezer does 'fess up. lol
- Log in to post comments
That's interesting. Sorry to
That's interesting. Sorry to ask an intrusive question, but why is that? Perfection? Detachment? No matching drive? Do ignore if that's a question too far.
- Log in to post comments
Yes, so, I'm thinking it's a
Yes, so, I'm thinking it's a non-drive thing, plus a psyche versus persona issue (that old chestnut). Thank you for the insight - appreciate it -
- Log in to post comments
Sorry. Actually, I feel
Sorry.
Actually, I feel quite confused by the above as well, but that's good in that the first stage of insight is to mess about with assumptions and simplicities, shake 'em up kind of a thing. Contradictions, for example, are just seemingly mutually-contradictory truths. They're not contradictory - we just don't understand them well enough to see why they're not, he said portentously! hahaha
- Log in to post comments
Sorry. Actually, I feel
Sorry.
Actually, I feel quite confused by the above as well, but that's good in that the first stage of insight is to mess about with assumptions and simplicities, shake 'em up kind of a thing. Contradictions, for example, are just seemingly mutually-contradictory truths. They're not contradictory - we just don't understand them well enough to see why they're not, he said portentously! hahaha
- Log in to post comments
Join the club! lmao Sorry,
Join the club! lmao
Sorry, what I endeavouR to purport there is, that similarly unto yourself, I myself (AS IN ALL ELEMENTS AND PARTICLES APPeRTAINING UNto SOME PRE-conCIEVED SENSE OF SELF AS DETERMINED IN THE CONTEXT OF MINE OWN SELF) haven't anything more than the barest foggiest of whatever it is that I find myself producing either oracularly or, indeed, orthographemicologically.
Hope that sorts that one out!!
lmao = like my aunt ottoline
- Log in to post comments
Nope, once a pompous
Nope, once a pompous supercilious prat, always a pompous supercilious prat - it's a terminal condition.
- Log in to post comments
Strangely, I find myself
Strangely, I find myself speechless. Over to you ...
- Log in to post comments
I fear, however, you have
I fear, however, you have cured me.
But also, thats a 'cop-out'. You haven't been able to come up with a name for that there charity.
Admit it!
All that stuff about #illicit love# - was that just a fiction really?
'Fess.
- Log in to post comments
Artistic licence that is
Artistic licence that is also highly credible in its portrayal of something or someone is great art - I take my hat off to you.
And, actually, I would never be judgemental about illicit love - it seems to me to be a (possibly slightly abusive) response to other abuse of one kind or another, either personal or social. It is usually, in my perception, as a much a courage as a cowardice ... a seeking for air when people feel they are drowning.
What slightly gave away the fiction, though, was that the heroine didn't seem to be being that careful about protection, if you get my drift, re. line 17, and I felt that she didn't seem the kind of person who would easily take such a risk within such a scenario.
For the charity, I've been thinking of calling it 'Vain' - I don't know it's something to do with 'vanity' and 'in vain' - something to do with changing mind-sets, but maybe that's what life-coaching is all about, I don't know and I'm not inclined to find out.
Apologies if, as ever, I make no sense. :)
- Log in to post comments