Ex-Servicemen Sleeping Rough

27 posts / 0 new
Last post
Ex-Servicemen Sleeping Rough

At the risk of offending someone ….. ah hell, there’s always someone who’ll get offended, isn’t there? With a cold winter approaching I read today that it’s been estimated (because of course nobody knows for certain) that up to 25% of men and women living rough in our cities are former service personnel. In fact, I also read that there are up to 100,000 homeless ex-servicemen in Britain.

It’s even been suggested that these are men who are sometimes unable to find beds in shelters because they are currently full of immigrants.

Now before anyone shoots me down, I’m not implying that destitute Poles, Romanians, Somalis and Lithuanians don’t need help, because they surely do. Whether they’re illegal or not, they’re still human beings. But surely we have to look after the people who’ve been willing to put their lives on the line for this country as well.

Personnel who’ve seen action in Afghanistan or whatever hot-bed they’ve been sent to have been taught to be competitive and aggressive and are then asked to forget all that and integrate back into a normal society without any problems.

Under Section 189 of the Housing Act 1996, a homeless person will have a priority need for re-housing if he/she is vulnerable as a result of "having been a member of Her Majesty’s regular naval, military or air forces". Vulnerability to an ex-serviceman/woman can mean Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome, severe mental illness, depression, night terrors, flashbacks and behavioural problems.

Housing illegal immigrants while ex-servicemen are on the streets just can’t be right.

There should be room for everyone Karl- shouldn't there?
There should, High, there should, but it's only a small country.

 

It is not such a small country,just a cramped one, too cramped in some areas while too empty in others, but I agree entirely with the original poster

 

It isn't right, Karl, but then a lot of things aren't right. Maybe if our weak, lily-livered government cut through the red tape and immediately shipped the illegals back wherever they originate from there would be room to house people who have fought for this country (and before anyone labels me a racist let me tell you that I'm in a mixed race relationship, and my black wife agrees with my views). I understand people wishing to escape genuine, life threatening oppression, and I agree with us taking in a limited number of genuine asylum seekers, but Britain is a tiny speck on the globe, and it's full almost to bursting point. The free-loaders only want to come here because they are given everything their greedy hearts desire on a gilded plate, and as the country's resources are finite that leaves needy residents staying in need.
That's just my point, the freeloaders are "given everything their greedy hearts desire on a gilded plate" (on our tax money) whilst people who've fought and risked their lives for this country are on the streets.

 

The words below were written by an ex-soldier; ‘I have just read your blog. It is actually me who the article is written about. I wanted to thank you for taking an interest in my plight and the plight of so many other service men and women who find themselves in similar circumstances. Whilst being homeless i have experienced human kindness at its very best and also how cruel some people can actually be. I have found myself judged negatively on a daily basis for just being a homeless male, I have been called a liar, a fraud, I have been urinated on whilst I slept, assaulted on several occasions, spat at, had laxatives put in cups of tea and food people have brought for me. All of this has happened without people knowing how I ended up on the street in the first place. All I will say is it involved a house fire and the death of my wife and two children. I do not drink or take drugs of any kind and yet daily I am treated like an animal. I can truly understand how so many ex-service personnel end up taking their lives when they find themselves homeless and tarnished with a label saying "Scum-bag". Thanks again for writing the article and many many thanks to your kind friend who has shown me that human kindness does still exist in some people. Be Blessed. Stephen.’

 

I think that estimated statistic is true; I've noticed that a lot of the homeless people I've met are ex-service personell. There are also scary statistics about the proportion of homeless people who were in social services care as children. I just wonder though, these people who come from abroad to feast on our riches...they really come all this way to sleep in a homeless hostel? They must be pretty disapointed when they get here huh. All that glitters is not gold. It's a throw-back to the days of our empire that half the world think we walk around on gilded streets with silver spoons in our mouths and Nike on our feet. This is the result of hundreds, if not thousands of years of our ethnocentrism and corrupt dealings. It's not our fault as individuals, it's what we have inherited from our ancestors, just like in some countries people inherited famine and civil war.

 

My mother in law retired a few years ago and went back to Jamaica where she was born, and still she is treated as a 'returnee' and overcharged whenever traders think they can get away with it, simply because they think that anyone who has spent their working life in Britain is ridiculously wealthy. And it's not just the plight of the homeless that reflects the preferential treatment given to some people in our so-called democracy with supposed equal rights for all. I've been out of work for the best part of three years (and it's not for want of trying to find a job, I try very hard). I worked for almost nineteen years in heavy industry only to find that I was only entitled to six months' job seeker's allowance. My wife has a minimum wage job, and we have to survive on her wage and child tax credits, because I have no benefits. My Job centre advisor told me in confidence that if I was a recent immigrant, who has paid nothing into the system, I would be given a mobile phone, a computer and a car, I would have driving lessons paid for if I was a job seeker without a driving licence and I would be sent on no end of free courses to learn new skills - and if I had children in another country the government would even grant them money! This country is throwing many of its long term residents on the scrap heap in favour of looking after the world's waifs and strays.
What a sad plight to be in, Stephen. In Canada I would refer someone in your situation to the local Legion where a member may have room in their home for a boarder. Why not try a similar idea in your community? May God bless and care for you. Why not also try for a caretaker job, or a watchman, on a temporary basis with a local church, or a veteran's hall, and be allowed to sleep there, at least until you get on your feet? --Richard
Richard L. Provencher
I'm tempted to say that what your advisor told in confidence...isn't true, it just seems a bit far fetched. I've known and spent time with a few different asylum seekers and immigrants and have never seen them get that sort of treatment; I think they get about a third of the usual social security amounts while they are waiting for thier status to be decided by the home office. I may be wrong, maybe the jobcentre does dole out laptops to every other Pole, but I just find it very unlikely. Plus, they would only recieve proper benefits when their case has been decided so that means that if someone has been granted leave to stay in the UK, for reasons the home office have approved such as persecution etc, then if a mobile phone will help that person get a job, then why not give it to them? It's not the foreigners fault that our government lies to us and treats us like morons, we should take it up with fruadsters in parliament if we have a problem with the way our economy and social security system is run. Sometimes I suspect that the corrupt tabloid press spread rumours and half truths about immigration to distract us all from the daylight robbery of those in government who have pledged to and are paid to serve us. I'm sorry, I've become too opinionated of late; I should go and write a book or something...... :)

 

Sometimes I think the lunatics truly have taken over the asylum. Take the case of ex-Watford footballer, Al Bangura, from Sierra Leone. By the time he was a teenager he’d survived a civil war, escaped from a black magic voodoo cult whose rituals include self-mutilation, and fled a child sex ring who’d trafficked him into Britain, where he claimed asylum as an unaccompanied minor and was cleared to stay in the UK. However, the Home Office lodged an appeal on a legal technicality, claiming his status as an asylum seeker changed when he turned 18 years-old. In 2007 he lost his case to stay in the UK, despite Bangura fearing a return to his war-torn homeland, where he would be under threat from the Soko tribe, formerly led by his late father. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/other-sports/dont-send-me-home-to-die-528708 Bangura explained to the Watford Observer, “It’s not the end of my career if I go back. It’s the end of my life.” An appeal against that decision was backed by FIFPro, Watford MP Claire Ward, Watford manager Aidy Boothroyd, former Home Secretary David Blunkett, and Elton John, the club's honorary Life President. A peaceful, pre-arranged, halftime protest was staged at Vicarage Road during a match against Plymouth Argyle with players wearing "Save Bangura" t-shirts and fans holding up posters of his face with the message, “He’s family.” Bangura walked around the ground to a standing applause. Everyone wondered what would happen when he reached the Plymouth away end, but they also gave him a standing applause. It was really quite moving, and I’m proud to have witnessed it. Four days later the Home Office announced that Bangura would be allowed to remain in the UK while he applied for a work permit. Bangura won his appeal. The point here is that of all the immigrants to this green & pleasant land Bangura was a father, a role model to hundreds of youngsters and was actually in work; in fact in 2006 he paid an estimated £120,000 in tax – enough to feed a small army of unemployed. Yet it was Bangura the Home Office decided to target for extradition. It just doesn’t make sense.

 

Richard's suggestion of applying for caretaker jobs would be a good one if not for the fact that there are no jobs. Jobs with accomodation are so rare and sought after they are gone before they are offered almost. If you are thinking of school caretakers, sports premises and so on, many of these establishments have sold off their available accomodation and the caretakers commute. Anyway, few businesses will employ a homeless person when so many others arelooking for work. What a sad state of affairs. This country has lost all sense of proportion and there is very little fairness any more. I am so sad for all people in distress, whatever their origin, but we are being forced to make choices, and if the choice is between looking after our ex-service personnel or people from other countries with no ties to or who have contributed nothing to this land, then that choice must be made. I personally am fed up with seeing the new council housing in my area going to recent immigrants while my own kids have to fend for themselves in overcrowded and expensive flats and everything possible is done to prevent them getting benefits they and we have paid for. Karl is right. Sad, terrible but true. Linda

Linda

We are encouraged to finger point, demonise and advised that there are hard choices between needs. Do you not feel you are being fed a line when there are 'hard choices' being made in favour of those who have, against the vast majority, who have not. We are not dogs in a cage salivating at an obfuscated message conveyed by the woebegone bell ringers of Whitehall.

 

Linda, well said. Council housing should, of course, not go to recent immigrants over British born people. I don't mean to repeat football metaphors, but if a cup game is scheduled there is a strict line in the hierarchy for tickets (often several days, or even a couple of weeks, apart) i.e. 1) Season ticket holders first 2) Fans with a recent buying history (including at least one away game) next 3) Fans with a buying history over the last 18 months 4) Supporters who hold a fan membership 5) The general public And rightly so. The same hierarchy should apply for housing, benefits and even jobs, i.e. 1) People who hold UK citizenship, and who have ancestry in this country going back several generations 2) People who were born in this country 3) People who can demonstrate a positive contribution towards society (work record, or even becoming involved in the local community through parent governor boards, scouting movement, local sports, charity work etc.) 4) Vulnerable people who have served in the armed forces (section 189 of the housing act) 5) Legal immigrants 6) Illegal immigrants 7) Immigrants (legal or illegal) who make it clear they have no desire to integrate Just a thought (and I'm well aware there are many imponderables in that list)

 

Hi Karl, A brilliant post and some amazing comments. Stephen and Bangura are excellent examples of how the system doesn't work, but I can't get my head around the football ticket allocation comparison. Besides the fact that the British Empire will never be able to pay off its debt to the world for past actions (don't forget; we invented the concentration camp in South Africa), this country now stands alone as an inclusive democracy. Sure it's managed by a mixture of self-centred baffoons and incredibly hardworking individuals, that's always going to happen in a world where self-belief rules over track record, but there is no comparison in the entire world for our attempt to be truly multi-cultural. As for racially motivated exclusion tactics, which is how your housing/football ticket allocation would operate, it's as close as you'll get to Nazi Germany, so good luck to you if that's what you want. The whole footy ticket allocation system stinks in its own right because it doesn't include people who feel like watching a game of footy. It's a closed door, and for that reason I would never again pay to go and see a game. Last time I went was with my stepson in the family enclosure at the Emirates for the Emirates Cup (there's no way I'd be able to get tickets for a real game). The bloke behind us was pissed out of his skull and treating his kids like crap. When I made a comment to him, he asked me for a fight. Lovely. I used to go to Highbury on a Saturday for a tenner and that included the tube, a pint and a hot dog, plus I could stand in the North Bank and I could pogo when we scored. Today it's just money and a bunch of spoilt panzies kicking a ball about. It's odd that the amount of ex-servicemen homeless in the UK stands at 100,000 because that's the figure estimated for how many runaway children hit the streets every year, which works out as one every five minutes. It's about time the government was made responsible for its duty of care with vulnerable people. Front page headlines of wishes to right wrongs of abuse just won't rub any more. Actions, not words, are needed. Thatcher started closing down children's homes as soon as she got in but no real alternative has replaced them. Help for ex-servicemen was a buzzword about two years ago in the care industry but very little has actually been done and I think it may have been used as an acceptable way to close down alcohol/drug units with the promise of giving more help to servicemen. No such luck. Very few new units have emerged for servicemen, who have some of the highest rates of suicide, depression, alcoholism and compulsive gambling. As usual it's the community that takes the helm. The govt traets them like dogs on the street and would run them over if it could get away with it.

 

One time, I was a guest of some wealthy 'ex-pats' at a barbeque in Belgium and it was all really rather pleasant, then I asked "so, what's the difference between an ex-pat and an immigrant then?" They were still nice to me afterwards but they didn't look too overjoyed at my question.... I'm still not sure I get what the difference actually is. Answers on a postcard please :)

 

Yeah, a wealthy man's eccentric and a pauper's plain old mad.

 

They could go back to Iraq and beg for asylum armed with evidence of how the queen and the British government are trying to kill them. At least it's warmer there at this time of year.

Tanya Jones

I have a lot of sympathy with AlbertF's point of view. There is a heap of claptrap in this thread - free cars and driving lessons for example. What pure and utter nonsense. The immigration authorities in this country are incredibly tough and there is absolutely no evidence of immigrants taking up places in homeless shelters to the detriment of former armed service personnel. The real scandal - and it's been around for a long time now - is that so many former soldiers end up on the streets. Now that does need addressing - but it has nothing at all to do with immigration.
I was deeply psychotic while I was on the streets. So they put me in a psychiatric ward and it all evolved fromthere- now I have my own place to live with heating and a bath. I am lucky and not psychotic anymore.I am on disability benefits.
I have researched this matter, Tony, which I should have done in the first place before opening my big mouth. It seems that the rumours about immigrants and asylum seekers getting free phones, cars and driving lessons and automatically leaping to the front of the queue for housing, National Health Service treatment etc. are nasty BNP propaganda (which I should have suspected). I was given this whispered information by a Job centre adviser, so like a lot of other folk who hear such unsubstantiated rumours I foolishly accepted it as kosher, and now I feel guilty for mistaking misinformation for the gospel truth - and worse, for spreading muck while the instigators remain squeaky clean.
Thankyou for admitting this error. It is big of you. These pernicious stories get into the national culture and they are incredibly damaging. Don't believe all you are told!
This is what discussions are for....

 

You have several options if you're wrong, you can swear that black is blue even if it obviously is not, ignore the issue or admit your error. Telling the truth is always the best thing. The person at the Job centre told me a lot of stuff, you know the sort of thing, "Don't say I told you so or I'll get into trouble," and like an idiot I took it all in. If you simply Google 'immigrants and asylum seekers getting preferential treatment' lots of links come up denying the truth of this urban legend.
Getting to the truth nowadays is virtually impossible. The Internet is no more reliable than The Sun or a bloke down the pub. If you’re interested in debate or an honest exchange of views or writing about current events where do you research? Take any topic – ANY topic – and you’ll come up with a dozen different answers. All you can really do is research the topic thoroughly and then quote your sources. Doesn’t mean they’re right, of course, just means you’ve quoted your sources. I’ve been away for a few days on a course and have just taken a final exam, one of the questions of which was to discuss the limitations of techniques used to gather evidence. Some of my techniques (previous question) were legislation, statistics, publications and guidance notes, all of which can be out of date. The internet is an even more unreliable source in that in my industry (construction) I can find myself reading information from other industries (say, agriculture or manufacturing) or even information from another country. The only truth is that nobody knows the truth. I know I can swim, I know where I live, I know my family members and I know I cook a pretty decent paella, but that’s about the extent of my knowledge. As far as homeless people go, nobody can possibly know because they’re impossible to quantify.

 

That's so true, karl. You have to be careful if you're researching anything nowadays - the gross misrepresentations I've stumbled across on sites like Wikipedia never cease to amaze me.