Götterdämmerung


By Schubert
- 343 reads
It may come as no surprise to you, but we've been at it for over four billion years. Ever since the first nucleotides came to blows whilst enjoying a tasty primordial soup; jostling over who got the phosphorus or the carbon or the hydrogen atoms; and it's never stopped since.
As we developed, into what has been laughingly described as more sophisticated life forms, we got a little more creative. When the Clactonian flint knappers were caught napping 400,000 years ago, they were duffed up and their flints nicked. The Neanderthal tool flakers lost their flakes, the Minoan bronze age people lost their bronze and the Aboriginals lost everything, including their lives and their continent. A whimsical skip through time I grant you, but a clear illustration of how, from the earliest amoeba to the apex homo sapien, we casually extinguish each other to get what we want.
We know all this because most of it is recorded on cave walls or illuminated velum or YouTube and we can read, often in graphic detail, of the horrors we inflicted upon each other in furtherance of our quest and more importantly, how we justified what we did. And this is the really interesting bit, because we seem to have boiled it down to three main causes; religion, politics or greed. Three reasons we have come to accept, as a species, as reasonable grounds for genocide.
It took some time to recognise our failings, because it wasn't until 1837 that the German philosopher Hegel pointed out that the one lesson history teaches us, is that we never learn anything from history. We allow the same tacit motives to justify our seemingly unquenchable lust for fatal conflict.
Today, as tensions rise across the world driven by the crass stupidity of an assortment of psychopathic tyrants, the pattern remains unchanged. Nationalism, economics and the unstoppable lust for material essentials continue to push us towards ever more conflict. We claim self-defence, moral superiority or religious indignation in the full
knowledge that prolonged suffering is always the inevitableconsequence.
Tacit acceptance of these justifications is the tool we employ to anaesthetise ourselves from the horrific consequences of what we do. Things so unthinkable and so traumatic that we could never tolerate them without an opiate, an analgesic from the unbearable pain. We swallow the evident acceptance of our forebears, the narcotic which
allows us to sleepwalk through history with indifference. Then, under the influence, we proclaim proudly how now more wise, more sophisticated, more evolved, we will never make the same mistakes again. And the narcotic does its job, as we forget every lesson ever learned in preparation for more of the same. Collective memory is short lived, economic interests dominate and war is often very profitable indeed for the warmongers and the tyrants. So, how do we dismount this whirligig of human absurdity, rescind this executive ordered death warrant?
We drag this curse from its sleep and we employ a new word, an important word which properly reflects the destructive nature of the human condition. A word with sharp edges that will sit uneasily in the mind, refusing to let us forget....the word Götterdämmerung. It's a hell of a word you must agree, meaty and heavy and significant and created by a nation with more than a hundred and fifty types of sausage and a history of quite easily forgetting. Ignore it at your peril. Götterdämmerung, the end of the world through catastrophic violence wrought by the constant warring of the gods. The fading light before a total darkness created by those who couldn't help
themselves.
We should take this word and leave it in the secure hands of a new Ministry of Neverforgetting, staffed by the relentless, whose job it would be to ensure that we do just that....we never forget. Delegates around the table in Moscow or Kiev or Jerusalem would wear Götterdämmerung T shirts and scribble notes to each other with
Götterdämmerung biros. They would dine amicably in the Ring Cycle
Restaurant, reminding each other of the horrors we casually inflict on ourselves in spite of the lessons so painfully recorded. And then, when sense triumphed, they would toast their unanimous treaties with Götterdämmerung spring water, the water which quenched the fires and purified the world.
- Log in to post comments
Comments
yeh, we could be talking
yeh, we could be talking Norse mythology, Nazi death camps or just about Trump, generally. I wrote a collection of stories, which the refrain was, 'We belive in the coming apocalypse'. Can't remember how it all ended. Such is memory. Individual and collective.
- Log in to post comments
yes, but we should not be
yes, but we should not be dooming all the rest of Earth, too, while still describing ourselves as the most intelligent life form!
- Log in to post comments
Though confused up with the
Though confused up with the evoluton of atoms to amoeba to men, for which there is no evidence and much to deny, the ever constancy of quarrel and war is clear (every since Cain's jealousy of Abel), though as there is no unity of grievence, and many will be appalled at one aggression and inablility to bring peace, but have theirr own more minor problems with neighbours or relatives. And as there are always real wrongs and aggression being done, uniting everyone to avoid war would seem impossible in the world now.
But actually looking at how things went wrong in the past and trying to think how to handle future disputes is always needed. Rhiannon
- Log in to post comments
From my study of biochemistry
From my study of biochemistry, the gaining of information for such changes would seem statistically impossible. Mutations damage, and for a 'new characteristic' many simultaneous 'good' mutations would have to occur, or they would produce an unworkable, hindering half-new-characteristic that would be detrimental. Some loss of information can sometimes give some benefit in some cases, but it is not development or evolution. So yes, I would say scientifically the problems of an evolutionary viewpoint of origins are increasing. There has been variation and adaptation for different environments but that is not evolution, some individualls survive in one location, others don't. The main kinds of animals and plants had to be created by a Designer, and then could undergo some variation eg different kinds of dogs etc, but not fish to bird!
I have written on it much in my 'Grand designs' collection. The website creation.com is run by very well qualified and serious scientists. Rhiannon
- Log in to post comments
Found this thought provoking,
Found this thought provoking, Thank You! "We swallow the evident acceptance of our forebears, the narcotic which allows us to sleepwalk through history with indifference."
Why it must always be so important for those who would be gods to stamp out questions that might wake up awareness. Call them woke, maybe
BRILLIANT response to your own IP :0)
- Log in to post comments
Gotta Getta Götterdämmerung
It's incredible that your piece on such a dark and gloomy topic raised smiles, and even chuckles, as I was reading it.
The gloomiest part was the bit about the Clactonian flint knappers. Life went so badly wrong for them 400,000 years ago and to make matters worse they now have Nigel Farridge as their MP. Extinct civilisations don't know they're born.
A very entertaining read. Thank you Schubert for brightening my afternoon.
Turlough
- Log in to post comments