Women are too strident in their advocacy.
By jxmartin
- 915 reads
Women Are Too Strident In Their Advocacy
I have seen this canard foisted often in the public arena. Women are deemed “strident” if their advocacy of a good and decent cause, when their voices rises above the level of a genteel whisper. Yet, some of our finest and most noble representatives in Washington have been Women. Jeanette Rankin, Margaret Chase Smith, Eleanor Roosevelt, and several contemporary worthies, have exhibited the moral courage to stand up, under the considerable fire of male opposition, and take an ethical position that turned the tide of history for the American people.
One is mindful, of the stately visage of Maine Senator Margaret Chase Smith, chastising Wisc. Sen Joseph McCarthy for his excesses in the 1950’s, one of the few at the time who had the courage to do so. And you can’t say enough about people like Eleanor Roosevelt, and all of the causes that she led, to improve life in America for all of its citizens. Yet, still the undercurrent against “stridence in women’s speech” lingers.
Were I born of that remarkable and esteemed gender, you wouldn’t just hear “stridency” in my voice, against all of the inequities that women fight against. You would hear a goddamn howl of outrage that would shake the foundations of society. And I would have long ago engaged in acts of open rebellion and political activism that would have had me shot or incarcerated decades ago. Stridency my butt! Let all men stand in the long lines for the restroom, that women do on a crowded day in any sports or holiday venue. They wouldn’t tolerate it. Let all men be paid 70% of what women earned for the same work! There would be rioting in the streets!
I like to think over the years, that I have tried to ameliorate some of these inequities, at least in venues where I had the ability to do so. Most of my career has been spent in Civil Service. Equal pay and the other irritants have long been at the top of the organized labor political agenda, here in New York State. Their collective efforts have yielded fruit in many areas of the public workplace. Their political clout has altered and improved many areas of the public domain, for everyone, in a dozen fields.
So, the next time you see or hear some knucklehead say that women are “too strident,” get right in that person’s face and utter the classic street rebuttal, “stridency my ass.” And if collectively, people do that every time the issue is raised, the false and silly notion will go the way of the dinosaurs who first uttered it. Right into the dustbin of history.
Many of the worst inequities against women, minorities, working people, the disabled and others not on “the top of the social heap” have changed and improved greatly during the last fifty years in America. We still have a long way to go. And I hope women will continue to stand at the forefront of the issues of the day, as they always have, and help make America a better place to live. God Bless you every one.
-30-
(533 words)
Joseph Xavier Martin
- Log in to post comments
Comments
women, bliacks, the disabled,
women, bliacks, the disabled, the elderly, and poor people in general have went back in time. They really are gettig a shit deal. Strident doesn't even touch how bad at deal the non-wealthy, genearlly wroking class are getting. Yeh, let's ceelbrate and honour those you mention, but things are far worse now, than in the seventies, eighties, nineties or even this century.
- Log in to post comments
Well argued point of view
Well argued point of view essay. Yes, why do us little dears get out of the kitchen and get strident. It is because we have tried asking politely and got nowhere. You are right that this applies to all groups who are not in a postion of power. Lenin said 'the working-class woman is the slave of a slave'. Not always, we are all individuals and sometimes a wife can be the one who tells her hubby what to do but he has a point.
- Log in to post comments