Theory
By Ewan
Wed, 17 Jun 2009
- 4184 reads
24 comments
Here is a theory;
there is no conspiracy.
There is chance -
if you prefer it -
happenstance.
There are drunk chauffeurs:
the footprints are on the moon.
We are paranoid;
we are now complicit.
Everyone knows,
there is video - and
the circuit is closed.
The planes were hi-jacked,
the footprints are not Presley's.
There is chaos,
there is coincidence
- something still called
common sense.
Eleven miles an hour,
there was no-one on the knoll.
- Log in to post comments
Comments
...but, but, it's what we
Permalink Submitted by lenchenelf on
...but, but, it's what we do, we make up stories :-)
sharp as ever. atb Lena
- Log in to post comments
I always think that if the
I always think that if the Nixon administration could fake the Moon landings then how did they make such a cock-up of covering up Watergate :)
- Log in to post comments
To show that there was no
Permalink Submitted by luigi_pagano on
To show that there was no conspiracy we shall hold an inquiry behind closed doors.
- Log in to post comments
Yea, nice one and about
Permalink Submitted by threeleafshamrock on
Yea, nice one and about time; but hey if you can't write a story, it's a great way to get published. There is always someone willing to believe anything - especially if it is unbelievable and without a shred of evidence.
Chris ;)
- Log in to post comments
Hear hear Chris. Liked this
Permalink Submitted by sarah wilson on
Hear hear Chris. Liked this and would like to be on the committee with Luigi please:) sarah x
- Log in to post comments
I've got to say this one has
I've got to say this one has got me stumped! (not the first time I know but hey! At least I'm having a crack at it. ;))
When I saw the title I was expecting a set of statements which would explain something but then I looked up the word and it could simply mean 'speculation', so I was off to a poor start before I started if you know what I mean ;)
Then I read the piece and it is written in a way that with a little imagination it could mean so many things that I don't quite know what to take from it. It seems to be calling for responses given the "well...?" trailer but I have no idea how to respond as I'm unsure what it's asking of me. I was waiting to see what the rest of you guys made of it but so far only two different viewpoints so I'm still confused. Am I missing the plot here?
HELP!! What are you saying with this one about Ewan?
- Log in to post comments
Hi Ewan. Thanks for
Hi Ewan. Thanks for replying. An interesting viewpoint and given your bio one that might be fun to explore further with you on another type of website. I spotted all the pointers, I think, (although I hadn't heard of the Elvis footprints one ;-)) I guess it was perhaps more what you weren't saying that caused my confusion.
eg. Yes the planes were hi-jacked but I think the main conpiracy theory was who knew they were going to be? Yes there are drunk chauffeurs but was Louis Paul actually drunk?
Anyway, now I see what you meant so thanks again for explaining it. :-)
I'm so pleased I didn't tell you what I actually thought you were saying before you explained it. ;D ha! ha! lol. Really must get my imagination in check ;-). Cheers
- Log in to post comments
No I hadn't heard of that
No I hadn't heard of that one. Perhaps too young at the time.
- Log in to post comments
Aha, so you've already
Aha, so you've already covered conspiracy theory. Might have known. What about Cherynobyl meaning I can't remember the word, something with a lord of the rings tone to it...dogwood or something... and this is the important bit. It was predicted by Nostradamus.
- Log in to post comments
Sounds like Wikipedia
Permalink Submitted by threeleafshamrock on
Sounds like Wikipedia describing themselves ;)
- Log in to post comments
Haha! OK, some things are
Permalink Submitted by threeleafshamrock on
Haha! OK, some things are universal.
- Log in to post comments
ewan if everyone agreed with
Permalink Submitted by Insertponceyfre... on
ewan if everyone agreed with you about conspiracy theories being bollocks the world would collapse. most documentary makers would lose their jobs, many writers would starve, several newspapers would be left with blank pages, and millions of people would lose an interesting hobby that currently keeps them off the streets. Are you willing to have all this on your conscience?
- Log in to post comments
I did like reading it though
Permalink Submitted by Insertponceyfre... on
I did like reading it though
- Log in to post comments
'wormwood' that's what I
'wormwood' that's what I meant Ewan, for the word for Chernoybl. My mind works sometimes. Not in straight lines.
- Log in to post comments
emmm it's been an
emmm it's been an interesting diversion, but I'm sure I read somethng/somewhere and that was the word used? Well, maybe not so sure now. Quite sure. Could be. Maybe not?
- Log in to post comments